BBC-another nail in the coffin.

Very interesting article here from blogger Autonomous Mind about how the BBC decided that they would abandon any pretence of impartiality on the subject of global warming/climate change.They maintained that the science was settled after a meeting of  the "best scientific experts"in 2006 convinced them that the threat from climate change was so important that anyone who challenged this view would not be allowed the "oxygen of publicity".Since that date hardly a programme has gone by without some mention of  global warming/climate change .
Any attempt to discover who these "best scientific experts" were failed because the BBC refused to respond to any FOI requests citing there own get out clause of  holding it for the purpose of "journalism, art or literature" and therefore exempt even though there is no such clause in the legislation.
Blogger Tony Newberry of Harmless Skies has attempted to get the names for 8 years without success but fellow blogger Maurizio Morabito of the omnologos blog  has finally met with success  and now we know who the names are and more importantly why they were attempting to hide this information. These "best scientific minds" were in fact not best at anything least of all science and included 25 environmentalist eco campaigners, a staffer from the US Embassy, students, someone from the Church of England, an insurance industry consultant, and even a representative from the CBI.Read the articles yourself and decide for yourself  if the BBC has lied to the world and then used taxpayers money to cover up the fact that the decision to lie was taken on the basis of a meeting with a few eco nutters and self interest groups.This could potentially be as big and as explosive as anything that has gone before .

BBC-we lie its what we do best.

Climate wars go Hot.

Mad Kari Norgaard stated at a recent meeting of climate looney tunes in London that if you dont believe in man made global warming you are mentally ill and she wants you"treated" for this affliction.
Such views are common place in the extreme wing (is there any other) of climate warmist  groups.

Most people who want to do harm to others can be classified as mad,bad or sad.Clearly Kari Norgaard falls into one of these groups but I am not sure whether she is truly mad or bad.Like the playground bully who makes up for their shortcomings by taking out on others they disagree with Kari obviously has issues around her self image (I could be cruel and say I am not surprised) in that she has to project this Stalinist ideal of re education for those that dont agree with her views.

We are now entering the next phase of the AGW battle for your mind and your cash.The  AGW theory has crashed and burned over the last couple of years in that realists have gained the upper hand by highlighting the lack of science  behind the theory.The alarmists know the game is up(and the funding) and are resorting to the age old tactic of portraying their opponents as insane and inhuman for having the bared faced cheek to not agree with true eco fascists like Norgaard.Well all I can say to Norgaard is "come and get us if you think your hard enough".

Realists have won the battle but the alarmists believe they can still win the war by eliminating their opponents in a climate war "final solution" action.

Climate wars has definitely gone hot.

This is the woman we are talking about - mad or bad?

“The common enemy of humanity is man"

Tony Blair .

The whole quote is

“The common enemy of humanity is man.

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up

with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,

water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these

dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through

changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.

The real enemy then, is humanity itself."

- Club of Rome

Speaks for itself really doesn't it.Humanity (which I assume the members of this organisation consider themselves to be above)needs controlling and culling so that the earth can flourish with them in charge.
People who talk of the ruling elite who are committed to a one world government and a new world order are labelled as conspiracy theorists and nutters but the truth is that this is is no theory its a definitive conspiracy against humanity .If the Club of Rome was just a group of eco nutters that believed that the population of the earth needs to be culled and those that are left should be the property of a neo marxist one world government we could all dismiss them as nutters and ignore them.
Unfortunately we cannot ignore the Club of Rome because it is run by and for the benefit of those people who consider themselves to be the ruling elite for all the people of the earth.The members may be nutters but they are powerful influential nutters who would sell the soul of everyone on this planet if it was to their personal benefit to do so.

The Club of Rome and its subsidiary organisations are the power behind the push for population control and the destruction of countries using the threat of famine and global warming .The new world order is actually the ruling elite of 300 ruling over the whole planet and enslaving humanity (or at least whats left of us after they have depopulated the planet).
On a local level we have the traitors in parliament who have sold this country out to the EU but this is all part of the plan of the ruling 300.The aim is to destroy nations and create unions across the globe to represent certain areas such as the North American Union,The European union etc etc.Once all the nations of the world have been destroyed and subsumed into a group of unions the next planned step is to amalgamate all the unions into a one world government or new world order if you like.Quite rightly we direct our hate towards the EU because it is the EU that we see as the threat to us.The EU however is just a bit part in the main event Once the EU has succeeded in destroying the nations of Europe and remoulding them(Fabian style) into a political entity called the united states of Europe its job will be done because it will then be subsumed into a global union with the elite ruling over the whole planet.

We are well on the way towards the globalist elites aims and daily we see countries under attack both physically and financially to enable a global coup next year.Everything is being ramped up for a global takeover at the end of next year to take advantage of the confusion and uncertainty among some of the earths population over the end of the Mayan calendar.The globalist elite have already brainwashed most people into believing that the earth is warming despite the figures saying the opposite.We are bombarded with "news" articles from organisation affiliated to the ruling elite that everything from earthquakes to ice melting in spring is caused by man made climate change.They figure that in 2012 they can get the worlds population so confused that we will all welcome a world government with open arms.
So be aware and help people understand what is going on .2012 is not going to be the end of the world but unless we wake up it may well be the end of society as we know it and the beginning of a new global dark age.

Don't believe me then consider and research the following.

Geo engineering,aerosol spraying.
GMO food.
Fluoride in water.
Agenda 21.
Population Control.
Plastics causing infertility.
Club of Rome.

A good place to start is this website which expands on these things better than I can.Of particular note is this page which names names.

Would it surprise anyone that those names include cunts such as Al Gore,George Soros,Henry Kissinger and our own Tony (cunt) Blair.

Man Made Global Cooling.

Dr Robert Kaufmann renowned weirdy beardy and climate change zealot has let the cat out of the bag today.He has admitted that the global climate is not warming at all and hasnt done for quite some time.In fact he goes a bit further and proclaims that because the expected warming hasnt occurred something must have offset the temperature rises.Dont get the impression that Kaufmann and his eco looneys have seen the light and come round to the accepted view that global temperatures are influenced by the sun and its variable activity rather than minute changes of an inert gas in the atmosphere.Excuses have to be found to explain this lack of warming or else the lucrative money go round will come to an abrupt halt and Kaufmann and his mates wont be able to charge $108 for a book on their addled thoughts .
The explanantion that has been speedily thought up is that ....wait for it...the emissions from Chinas rapidly expanding coal fired power generation plants which we have all beeen told is going to cause us all to burn to a frazzle is actually cooling the earths climate down!!.I dont really understand the logic either but I suppose if you paint yourself into a corner over manmade C02 warming and there is no warming you will have to think pretty quickly to explain it away without admitting the whole theory of man made warming or cooling is a crock of crap.
We will see a whole lot more of this rubbish from Kaufmann and his ilk because the sun is going into an extended period of low activity which will definitely cause a real drop in global temperatures for perhaps decades to come.We are witnessing the death throws of a failed pseudo scientific theory which seems to support the fact that tiny changes in the atmosphere over China can change the whole globes temperature upwards or downwards depending on what nuthouse theory you are following this week.
Still what can you expect from someone who proclaims to be a climate scientist but doesnt look beyond the confines of the earth and take into account the source of the heat and energy being put into the global weather system.Only to be expected though if you rely on an expert in economics and energy policy to explain something as complicated as the global climate.
Why are so many of these zealots economists? well who do you think came up with the idea to tax the very air that we breathe .

How to Bake a Green Cake.

When you bake a cake sometimes you follow the ingredients to the letter and it turns out shit .Having a recipe for baking a perfect cake is no real help because there are so many variables and even a slight variance of quantities can make all the difference between scrummy and shit.It matters not how many times you repeat the process because each time slight variables within the quality and quantity of ingredients and the temperature /duration of the cooking will affect the final result.
Imagine you had never baked a cake before but you wanted to always bake the perfect cake.Your friend who has also never baked a cake before comes up with the perfect solution of creating a computer model that would simulate the cake baking process.
The problem is that no one knows what goes in a cake and how it is prepared and cooked.Well the solution is simple just program your simulation so that whatever ingredients you use it always produces the perfect cake.Sump oil mixed with rice crispies and salt and vinegar crisps baked in a virtual oven for 30 seconds at 30 degrees will produce the computer simulation of a perfect cake.
You decide that you have perfected the virtual aspect of it so nows the time to bake in real life.Time after time you try different ingredients in variable amounts and cook for random times at various temperatures but still it comes out shit.You cant understand why this is not working because the model produced perfect cake every time.
This is exactly the process that goes on at the Hadley Centre and other climate change fairytale organisations to produce the results that shows that the world is warming because someone up the road has a Range Rover.As with any modelling program if you put crap in then crap will come out,it might be slightly different crap but it will still be crap .
The simple way to measure the average temperature across the globe would be to measure the temperature at various locations across the globe the same local time everyday for several years.If the average temperature shows an alarming rise year on year then thats the time to start worrying .
The alarmists however have a better idea that avoids all that inconvenience of having to measure things over a long period of time .They just invent a model that always says the world is warming regardless of what data you put in.Because the model doesnt need real world data to make it work the model is accepted as perfect .The alarmists are happy it always produces the desired result of a  a warming trend so therefore can use it to predict global temperatures decades in the future.
So the next time you read the global warming crap that comes out of the mainstream media daily remember that the guesswork that produces a  3 degrees increase in temperatures by 2050 ish is the equivalent of putting sump oil ,rice crispies and crisps in an oven and hoping that a perfect cake pops out.

Climate Change Worm starts to turn.

Carbon warming too minor to be worth worrying about
By David Evans

The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro-thin half-truths and misunderstandings. I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, understands the evidence, was once an alarmist, but am now a skeptic. Watching this issue unfold has been amusing but, lately, worrying. This issue is tearing society apart, making fools out of our politicians.

Let’s set a few things straight.

The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s. But the gravy train was too big, with too many jobs, industries, trading profits, political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control riding on the outcome. So rather than admit they were wrong, the governments, and their tame climate scientists, now outrageously maintain the fiction that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.

Let’s be perfectly clear. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, and other things being equal, the more carbon dioxide in the air, the warmer the planet. Every bit of carbon dioxide that we emit warms the planet. But the issue is not whether carbon dioxide warms the planet, but how much.

Most scientists, on both sides, also agree on how much a given increase in the level of carbon dioxide raises the planet’s temperature, if just the extra carbon dioxide is considered. These calculations come from laboratory experiments; the basic physics have been well known for a century.

The disagreement comes about what happens next.

The planet reacts to that extra carbon dioxide, which changes everything. Most critically, the extra warmth causes more water to evaporate from the oceans. But does the water hang around and increase the height of moist air in the atmosphere, or does it simply create more clouds and rain? Back in 1980, when the carbon dioxide theory started, no one knew. The alarmists guessed that it would increase the height of moist air around the planet, which would warm the planet even further, because the moist air is also a greenhouse gas.

This is the core idea of every official climate model: For each bit of warming due to carbon dioxide, they claim it ends up causing three bits of warming due to the extra moist air. The climate models amplify the carbon dioxide warming by a factor of three — so two-thirds of their projected warming is due to extra moist air (and other factors); only one-third is due to extra carbon dioxide.

That’s the core of the issue. All the disagreements and misunderstandings spring from this. The alarmist case is based on this guess about moisture in the atmosphere, and there is simply no evidence for the amplification that is at the core of their alarmism.

Weather balloons had been measuring the atmosphere since the 1960s, many thousands of them every year. The climate models all predict that as the planet warms, a hot spot of moist air will develop over the tropics about 10 kilometres up, as the layer of moist air expands upwards into the cool dry air above. During the warming of the late 1970s, ’80s and ’90s, the weather balloons found no hot spot. None at all. Not even a small one. This evidence proves that the climate models are fundamentally flawed, that they greatly overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide.

This evidence first became clear around the mid-1990s.

At this point, official “climate science” stopped being a science. In science, empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory — that just happens to keep them in well-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.

There are now several independent pieces of evidence showing that the earth responds to the warming due to extra carbon dioxide by dampening the warming. Every long-lived natural system behaves this way, counteracting any disturbance. Otherwise the system would be unstable. The climate system is no exception, and now we can prove it.

But the alarmists say the exact opposite, that the climate system amplifies any warming due to extra carbon dioxide, and is potentially unstable. It is no surprise that their predictions of planetary temperature made in 1988 to the U.S. Congress, and again in 1990, 1995, and 2001, have all proved much higher than reality.

They keep lowering the temperature increases they expect, from 0.30C per decade in 1990, to 0.20C per decade in 2001, and now 0.15C per decade — yet they have the gall to tell us “it’s worse than expected.” These people are not scientists. They overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide, selectively deny evidence, and now they conceal the truth.

One way they conceal is in the way they measure temperature.

The official thermometers are often located in the warm exhaust of air conditioning outlets, over hot tarmac at airports where they get blasts of hot air from jet engines, at waste-water plants where they get warmth from decomposing sewage, or in hot cities choked with cars and buildings. Global warming is measured in 10ths of a degree, so any extra heating nudge is important. In the United States, nearly 90% of official thermometers surveyed by volunteers violate official siting requirements that they not be too close to an artificial heating source.

Global temperature is also measured by satellites, which measure nearly the whole planet 24/7 without bias. The satellites say the hottest recent year was 1998, and that since 2001 the global temperature has levelled off. Why does official science track only the surface thermometer results and not mention the satellite results?

The Earth has been in a warming trend since the depth of the Little Ice Age around 1680. Human emissions of carbon dioxide were negligible before 1850 and have nearly all come after the Second World War, so human carbon dioxide cannot possibly have caused the trend. Within the trend, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation causes alternating global warming and cooling for 25 to 30 years at a go in each direction. We have just finished a warming phase, so expect mild global cooling for the next two decades.

We are now at an extraordinary juncture. Official climate science, which is funded and directed entirely by government, promotes a theory that is based on a guess about moist air that is now a known falsehood. Governments gleefully accept their advice, because the only ways to curb emissions are to impose taxes and extend government control over all energy use. And to curb emissions on a world scale might even lead to world government — how exciting for the political class!

Even if we stopped emitting all carbon dioxide tomorrow, completely shut up shop and went back to the Stone Age, according to the official government climate models it would be cooler in 2050 by about 0.015 degrees. But their models exaggerate 10-fold — in fact our sacrifices would make the planet in 2050 a mere 0.0015 degrees cooler!

Finally, to those who still believe the planet is in danger from our carbon dioxide emissions: Sorry, but you’ve been had. Yes, carbon dioxide is a cause of global warming, but it’s so minor it’s not worth doing much about.

Financial Post
David Evans consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010, modelling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. He is a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees, including a PhD from Stanford University in electrical engineering. The comments above were made to the Anti-Carbon-Tax Rally in Perth, Australia, on March 23

Taken from financial post article

Dummies guide to the climate changing.

Firstly we need to establish what the climate is exactly.Contrary to what we have had rammed down our throat on a regular basis by warmists the climate is NOT the same as the global atmospheric system.
Looking for a definition of climate and you find " the typical weather conditions in a particular area". Climate therefore can be local or cover a wider area but it is NOT anything to do with the Earths atmospheric system.If someone was to say Los Angeles has a warm climate there would be no argument but to describe the whole Earth as having a particular climate is ridiculous because everyone knows that different parts of the planet have different weather systems influencing them and therefore have different climates.Knowing that climate is local and not global means that climate change across the whole globe is impossible.Every local area has an overiding climate which obviously fluctuates due to the intereaction of all the other local climates across the globe.You cannot view one area without taking into account what is happening in other areas.
These changes in temperature are the driving force behind our weather.Warm air rises which creates low pressure and cold air falls which produces high pressure and the difference between the two causes ground air in the form of winds to be forced from high pressure areas to low pressure areas.
Like a 3d puzzle weather and local climates do not operate on one level nor do they operate on their own.Low pressure (rising air) causes clouds due to the cooling the warm air undergoes when it rises.High pressure however is falling cooler air so less clouds will form in warming cooler air than in cooling warm air due to the difference in the amount of condensed water that warm and cool air can retain.
On the edges of high pressure and low pressure areas is the area that is most volatile and is what we call a weather front.Simples really if you think about it.

The weather in the UK is not formed over the UK.Depending on what direction the weather fronts are coming from and the time of the year dictates the weather we have in the UK. The other driver for weather is the difference between sea and land with the land heating and cooling much quicker than water adding in another variable for our weather.Weather can change over a very short period but an areas climate will only change over a very long period.To take Los Angeles as an example-its weather will change from day to day or hour to hour but the climate will always be warm and dry.A thunderstorm would not change the climate but it would change the weather.
From this I think you can see that the term Climate Change to describe changes in the Earths atmosphere over a short period of time is a misnomer.
Even if we were confident that global temperatures over the last 30 years was showing an slight upward trend (which incidently they dont)that would be meaningless
given the age of the Earth (approx 4.5 billion years old).Only a fool would try to establish a meaningful trend from 30 out of 4.5 thousand million years.Given that
the Earths atmospheric system is so complicated and chaotic only a fool would believe that the Earths atmospheric system is reacting to minute changes (parts per million) of its constituent gases.
Underpinning all the weather drivers is obviously the Sun because without the warming of the sun there would be no heat which would mean no weather and no life .
The Sun however is not a stable source of consistent heat radiation .The Sun has periods of high activity and periods of low activity for reasons we are not really sure about but we do know that these highs and lows can be predictable because they occur in a cyclical pattern and can be monitored from earth.
Common sense would tell us that when the sun is most active the global weather system would be most active purely by virtue of the increased solar energy being put into the atmosphere.Also more energy would reach the surface of the Earth especially at the Equator which would produce higher ground/sea temperatures making the global weather system more energetic and chaotic.Lower solar activity would produce less energy in our atmosphere and less heat reaching the ground /sea making the global weather system less energetic and less chaotic.
Those people that believe that a tiny increase in one minor constituent gas in the atmosphere can drive changes in global weather are ignoring the Elephant in the room that is the Sun and its cyclical activity.If they can ignore a star on our doorstep
then is it any surprise that the weather warmists have no credible explanation to their theory.The only "supporting evidence" they provide for weather warming are the
adulterated temperature datasets spat out by their own computer models which bear no resemblance to fact.The computer models are designed in such a way that whatever figures you put in (say the number of doughnuts eaten in the UK per day)it will always produce an upward temperature trend.The warmists are so insecure about their theory that they do not publish the raw data and instead rely on their computer model results which are warped to say the least.
The earth is an incredibly complicated system and no part of the system can be viewed in isolation.In fact you cannot start to understand the Earth system unless you understand the Earths place in the solar system.Life as we know it is only possible on this planet because the Earth is just the right distance from the Sun.
Any closer to the Sun and we would be toast and any further away we would be ice.
Believing that tiny quantities of C02 in the atmosphere have a huge effect on the global weather system but changes in the heat being put in the atmosphere through the cycles of the sun doesnt is pure madness and flies in the face of all scientific understanding.
I think the problem is that the warmist alarmists are not scientists.They may call themselves climate scientists but they are no more than computer modellers and system analysts.Trying to fit real science into the man made warming theory is like trying to squeeze a quart into a pint pot-it simply will no work.Science says that
you cannot squeeze a quart into a pint pot but the warmists would point out that their model says you can and a consensus among themsleves agrees so therefore you can get a quart into a pint pot.
While we are at it can we also put to bed the ridiculous phrases "greenhouse effect" and "greenhouse gases".Greenhouses magnify and trap the heat from the sun by reducing the cooling effect of convection which has no bearing or similarity to the Earths weather systems nor does glass (which is technically a liquid) have any common properties with C02.It would be fantastic if we could use C02 as a high efficient heat insulator but we cant because it isnt and even if it was i dont think it would be very effective in a ratio of a few parts per million.
Another ridiculous phrase that we hear regularly but means nothing is carbon free or carbon neutral.On earth all lifeforms are carbon based and although C02 obviously contains an element of carbon it also contains more oxygen atoms .C02 is no more carbon than water is oxygen.When you make a cup of tea you dont fill up the kettle with oxygen do you so why is C02 suddenly transformed into carbon which it clealy isnt.
The answer is that everything is simplified so those that dont know their arse from their elbow will be able to explain something that simply doesnt hold up to scientific scrutiny.Education has been dumbed down to such an extent that if Al Gore said that sticking your head down the toilet would help the poor ickle Polar Bears from extinction loads of people would have very wet and smelly hair.

FUBAR and the end.

Listen up people I am going to tell you about something that will change your life.

Conspiracy theories abound and most people (including me)dismiss most out of hand.
Unfortunately that means that we throw the baby out with the bathwater by discounting things that sound so outrageous that common sense says cant be true.

I have come to the conclusion that if we open our minds to the fact that perhaps there are people and organisations across the globe that do not have our best interests at heart we will suddenly realise that our very existence is at risk.

Take global warming/climate change as an example.We are constantly told by the eco fascists that our world is warming up because of the emissions of C02 by us the people of this planet.Most people have decided that this is complete rubbish and cannot understand how an inert gas could cause any change in climate given the tiny percentage it makes up in the atmosphere.Sensible minds point to the natural cycle of the sun causing changes to our climate over a set period of time.If man made global warming existed then the real temperatures measured(as opposed to computer modelled data sets) across the globe would be the highest in human history.We all know that the earth has gone through periods of warming and cooling over its history with no help at all from humans.Ice ages come and go and warmer periods come and go.
If you study the sun you realise that we are heading towards a period of very low solar activity which will have the knock on effect of a colder climate on Earth.
In short the evidence is pointing towards us heading towards a new mini ice age.Dont panic yet though because it isnt going to happen any time soon.What we should be more than a little worried about is what the eco fascist warmist believers have in store for us all here and now.Despite dodgy science and no evidence of warming the eco fascists are busy planning to geo engineeer our planet in order to cool the planet and save us all from the mythical warming.Unfortunately this is all going to end in the biggest fuck up of all time resulting in millions of people across the globe dying which arguably was the plan of the eco fascists all along.
These people are dangerous people who make no secret of the fact that the earths population needs to be culled and that food production needs to go from a mix of meat production and arable to a vegetarian nightmare scenario whereby the only food available is GM modified chemical laden arable crap produced by companies like Monsanto who are busily patenting GM modified crops of all sorts.
By the time the eco fascists have finished we will all be a place of nightmares where natural crops have been killed off by the actions and consequences of the eco fascists geo engineering of our planet and we all have to rely on a dwindling and increasingly more expensive supply of genetically altered food.
So I think we should all be pretty worried about the fact that the eco fascists are planning to turn down the planets thermostat just when we need it most.
Perhaps worrying about plans to increase cloud cover and spray chemicals into the atmosphere to increase the reflection of the suns energy away from the earth is a waste of time because no one in their right mind would allow such a thing to happen.That nice Mr Obama along with the leaders of the "free world" wouldnt allow a few eco fascist lunatics to poison the planet just to save us from a non existent threat of rising global temperatures would they.

My advice would be dont worry about the plans because the plans are not plans any more they are programs that have been going on for the last 7 years or so.




Once you have viewed the above clip then I would urge you all to view this video to illustrate what these lunatics are doing to us in the name of saving the planet.

As in all things dont take anyones word for it-look it up yourself.Google geo engineering and chemtrails should get you started but research it yourself and make up your own mind.

If you cant be bothered to do that just look up into the sky on the next clear day.Is the sky lovely and blue with white fluffy clouds or is the sky a silvery blue with milky white ribbons of contrails criss crossing the sky speading out to create a multicoloured pollution sunset of all the colours of the rainbow.If its the former you can come back and tell me I am talking rubbish but if its the latter then be very afraid for your future and the future of your children.If you really want to sleep well at night look up the link between aluminium and Alzheimers .To cheer you up even further look up the reduction of bee populations and ask yourself what could be causing it.

Having digested all that information and looked it up yourself then ask yourself again-no one would be crazy enough to approve spraying the air we breathe with toxic metals would they?

We are all truly fucked unless we all switch off the goggle box and look at what is going on in real life as opposed to the unreal world of east corries x factor has strictly no talent bollocks.

Wake up and look up.

Climate data since 1659

As I am now a climate scientist I have decided to start up the Crowborough Climate Research Unit and do a bit of research into climate change.

Trying to find modern untampered data is pretty much impossible.The eco fascists like to produce lovely graphs showing whatever they want them to show.The actual temperature figures are closely guarded by the eco fascists because they release nothing until they have been"adjusted " to such an extent that the figures end up meaningless.Variance from average temperature records are a favourite because depending where you decide the average is depends on what the graph show and there is no one on this earth who can tell what an average temperature should be for any given time because of the huge number of variables involved.

I have however managed to find genuine mean yearly temperatures for central England compiled by G.Manley in 1974 and published in the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 100, 389-405.

The mean temperatures I am interested in are for the years 1659-1974 (when the data was published)which is ideal because in 1974 the climate change scam had not even been thought up.

Using the figures of over 300 years the hottest mean temperatures are for the years 1733,1736,1779,1868 and 1949.

Figures after 1980 are useless and subject to god knows what fiddling to prove that man made C02 is responsible for supposed warming.The later figures look even more dodgy when you consider that the consensus is that no global warming has occured over the last decade yet according to these figures central England would seem to have been subject to its own period of warming when the rest of the globe has remained static in terms of temperature and even cooled a bit.

So in summary there is no pattern to prove anything other than to say the climate is such a complex system that no one with half a brain can predict anything other than the figures have been well and truly cooked over the last twenty years to prove something that is simply not happening.

In short the whole theory is shot to pieces and has no basis in fact at all. Read the figures yourself and make your own mind up but dont take the word of people whose speciality is in history/politics but are adept at class one bullshitting.

The link actually works now.

Mark Lynas-Climate expert with a degree in History and Politics

Mark Lynas is a journalist "specialising" in climate change bollocks and an environmental fascist/activist who spouts his shite in the Guardian,Independent and New Statesman.

He is also in league with Franny(I am stupid) Armstrong infamous for the 10:10 film advocating killing climate realists.

Now you would think that someone like Mark would be highly qualified in the field of Chemistry and Physics at the very least to enable him to write about such a technical subject as to how an inert gas essential for life on earth could possibly have any influence on the temperature across the globe.

Well you would be wrong as Mark Lynas has (wait for it)a degree in history and politics which are not subjects you think about first when analysing and understanding a complex ecosystem .

Put it this way would you let a Doctor anywhere near you if they had a degree in Politics but talked a good talk as to how much they knew about how the body worked.

Given that I have got qualifications in physics , chemistry and geology I think that means that I am more qualified on the subject than supposed expert Mark Lynas. Judging by Mark Lynas's crappy little house and his crappy old car (yes he actually drives-what a fucking hypocrite) talking climate bollocks is obviously a great payer NOT.

So how can someone who has absolutely no understanding about what he is talking about be held up by the eco fascists as some sort of expert.

If this bullshitter is the best that the eco fascists can come up I have to tell them that it isnt good enough .

Climate change is a con and anyone with the little knowledge and understanding of the carbon cycle and C02 s role in sustaining life on the planet knows that its bullshit and bad science all rolled into one.Mark Lynas might like to refer to himself as an expert which I can agree with because in this instance ex means a has been and a spurt is a big drip.

Global Warming final solution.

Fucking hellski -we have had 5 inches of snow and as usual everything grinds to a halt.Checking out Whistler in Canada today and they have temperatures of minus 20 C with a couple of feet of snow and everything is running normally.

Why is it we put up with this every year.ESCC and Wealden council are totally useless and despite knowing for weeks that it was going to snow nothing has been done to keep us all moving.

The wankers in local government have bought the global warming myth hook line and sinker and cant see beyond their bollocky climate change agenda.If the cunts could bear to tear themselves away from wanking off over Al Gore for one moment and looked out the fucking window they would realise its cold and getting colder.I wonder how many people will die this
winter because the wankers in charge cant see common sense.Climate change alarmists have blood on their hands because for them money and power comes before common sense and humanity.Bastards the lot of them.
Personally I would round them all up and ship them to the North Pole with only a pair of flip flops and shorts each for clothes and watch them slowly freeze to death whilst being told-dont worry its the warmest year on record.