Is it any wonder why Sussex Police are so useless when they have people like this running it.
The bottom picture is of the Assistant Chief Constable no less who has raked up 24 years in the Police without doing anything of note at all.I think it would not be unkind to say that his knowledge of Policing does not extend beyond the doors of his office.He is definitely a paid up member of the shiny arsed brigade that has made a career out of avoiding the nasty business of actually Policing by meeting the people who pay his wages.
The top picture is of some useless individual whose name escapes me but has managed to wangle the position of chairman of the Police Authority.The words useless,scruffy,hippy,lefty springs to mind when I see his picture.
The authority is made up of the not great and definitely not good of Sussex society.If you could imagine a meeting of the gay and lesbian society of the local social services department you will have a good idea how crap the authority is.
You cant get the minutes of their meetings but I have obtained a summary below.
Blah blah blah diversity
Blah blah blah engagement
Blah Blah blah ethnic minorities
Blah blah blah muslims are really great.
Blah blah blah Im useless and pig ugly
Blah blah blah Alcohol is evil because my muslim pals say so.
Blah blah blah Im a lesbian with a chip on my shoulder
etc etc
Stretch this shit out for 2 hours and then play it back at a quarter speed and you will have some idea of the calibre of the meetings.Is it any wonder really that Sussex Police are useless when they have these absolute cretins in charge.Not one of those that attend the meetings have ever had a proper job(including the rossers).They all seem to be common purpose PC drones who cant think or speak up for themselves.
If you want to know more and identify some of the individual members then click here
Come the revolution there isnt going to be enough lamposts and piano wire for all these "useful idiots".
Stumbled onto your sight again from Google. Won't make that mistake again.
ReplyDelete-
My God! You really are a sad individual. If I could be bothered I would point out the number of times you have contradicted YOURSELF.
-
As for this being a site for comment, it is clearly nothing other than a means of you releasing your uncontrolled venom on the world.
-
However, you are consistent in two areas - whenever someone comments and says anything that YOU judge (often mistakenly) to be vaguely supportive of police you repeatedly trot out your apparently favourite phrase "You must work for Sussex Police". Not everybody that makes such comments works for Sussex Police or even agrees with or favours Sussex Police.
-
You really should learn to listen to what others have to say and investigate it. You will often find that they are correct. Their statements are usually based on knowledge or experience and opinions thus formed, rather than a sad, mentally deranged thought process producing nothing but angry statements of bigoted prejudice.
-
You really should TRY writing something or responding to something in a calm considered way, using reasoning and evidence rather than ill-considered anger.
-
Your other consistency? You always think you are right! I am so sorry to tell you, you are mostly mistaken and thus usually (nearly always) wrong. And even when you say things that are right or that I believe are right you are saying them for the wrong reason. Sad, isn't it?
-
This is almost always because you are commenting on things on which you have little knowledge, you know only some of the facts or on which you are mistaken.
-
I can't wait to see what allegations you make in response to my comments.
Thanks for your comment anonymong .
ReplyDeleteYou have clearly attended one too many common purpose NLP diversity courses because you seem to have an pompous inflated idea about your own importance.
My opinions are my opinions and by definition
cannot be wrong.I certainly dont need your approval or otherwise before publishing anything.
If you want to start a reasoned debate as to why you are right and I am wrong then by all means get on with it.If all you are going to say is "i
am right and you are wrong "then you dont really have an argument do you.
Just for interests sake which part of my article do you disagree with and why did it take 3 visits before you decided to pluck up the courage to comment on it.
PS if you know the scruffy bugger in the picture tell him to get his hair cut because the hippy look went out in 1979.
Little quiz for Anonymong.
ReplyDeleteWhich Police force was it that sent wimmin officers on a fashion awareness day with Gwok Wan Ker to help with their self confidence.
Clue-it starts with S and ends in X and has usse
in the middle.
If you still cant get it its the same Police force that arrested someone for wearing a t shirt
and shot someone for carrying a piece of wood.
I have attended one diversity course and found it largely petty, ill conceived and patronising. In addition, I questioned one particular assertion made on that course and those running the course could not answer my question.
ReplyDelete-
I have no inflated ideas about my opinions. I just have opinions as do you. Unlike you I express them in a considered way. I suggest that if you are looking for someone with inflated ideas of their own opinions, you re-read your own articles and comments.
-
Your opinions are your opinions and I have not questioned that they are your opinions but most of the opinions you express are ill-informed and not correct in that they make incorrect assumptions or are based on inaccuracies. In most cases they would be very simple to prove wrong. When you do express an opinion with which right minded people might or do agree, you do so in such a way as to offend those you seek to influence.
-
You certainly do not need my approval before publishing anything but if you publish your opinions and allow comments to be posted on those opinions you must expect comments.
-
If I wanted a reasoned debate I think you would be the last person I would choose to debate with. To have a reasoned debate one would, by definition, need to debate with someone who could reason, intelligently. I did not say I was right but I did say you were wrong, in relation to the things about which you were wrong. I therefore do not have or seek an argument but merely state my opinion.
-
I cannot remember which points made in your article that I agreed with and which I did not and I cannot be bothered to re-read it. As for it taking me three visits to your site before I decided to "pluck up the courage to comment on [the article]" - from memory, I think I navigated away a couple of times to check out some other web pages and do a little research before commenting - something which would improve your writing skills and better inform your opinions. I did not have to 'decide' to pluck up courage to comment, I needed no courage to comment, but had I needed courage I would still not have hesitated to comment. But I would have considered my response before commenting. Such an 'allegation' is very revealing about the person who makes it.
-
I do not know the 'scruffy bugger' in the picture, I do recognise him as a member of the Sussex Police Authority as I was once in the same room as him and overheard him talking. I would not presume to comment on his appearance until I knew what his views or opinions were. But I would consider that it is perhaps reassuring that Sussex Police Authority appoints someone who is not just chosen because he is a 'conventional, suited, establishment, yes-man'. What I do know is that he is better mannered and a more considered commentator than are you.
-
As for your 'twee' little quiz (commenting in the way that you do, does little other than demeans you) - Sussex Police recently sent female officers on such a course and I entirely and wholly disagreed with such action for reasons that I will not share with you. But it does however serve to prove the point that I made that when one does agree with a point you make it is difficult to support your comment because, in this case, you make it in such a petty way.
-
Finally, it is interesting to note that you have entirely failed to address the specific, key points I made in my post, demonstrating that you are apparently only really interested in two things. Firstly: ranting about things about which you have strong opinions and little knowledge; secondly: your own opinions.
-
You would be well advised to remove the facility for others to leave comments, that way you would be able to comment unhindered and see your bigoted opinions going uncontested. However, in so doing, you would lose the facility you have created for abusing others and you would of course not get the perverse satisfaction you seek, of soliciting responses to fuel your apparently slender intellect.
Thanks anonymong but your reply is way too long.
ReplyDeleteDespite what you say I like to leave comments on line for other people to enjoy and to make their own judgements of the author.
Anyone posting comments on anything at 03.25 must
either be drunk or a sad act.I hope you were drunk when you posted it because if you were stone cold sober you really have some mental health issues which need attending to.
Just one question though- if you are so clever and much more intelligent than other mere mortals why is your spelling so poor.
Hang on a minute cant spell,always think your right,limited intellect and mental problems-your fucking Gordon Brown go on admit it.
Just to show theres no hard feeling why dont you think up a witty interesting post and I will post it for you in your own right.
Truth is uncomfortable isn't it!
ReplyDelete.
Discomfort usually results in abuse, accusations and petty comments about spelling. Before you make such comments though you should consider your own use of grammar; and your punctuation is laughable. You also use split infinitives.
.
As for why I am awake at 3:25am - that is no business of yours and I am happy to let others judge which of us has mental health issues.
.
You have stated that I am 'so clever' - thank you, I have never considered myself clever and of only average intelligence.
.
As for thinking up a witty interesting post and [allowing you to] post it for [me] in [my] own right - thank you but I think not.
.
If I wanted to comment on the web I would do so on my own Blog or Forum or on that of an intelligent and balanced individual or organisation.
.
I have only posted on this forum for sport. It is fun to guess at the response that ones comments will solicit from an individual such as yourself - predictable but fun.
.
I also trust that it gives others pleasure when they read your bigoted responses.
.
Taxi!
At least you have made an effort to improve your spelling even if you are still having trouble using the correct words.
ReplyDeleteJust to remind you what your opening line was
"Stumbled onto your sight again from Google. Won't make that mistake again.".
See I have helped you to spell site correctly and now I am helping you to use a dictionary so you can now (almost) consider yourself to be a productive member of society.
Im afraid I cant help you with the last step as that is down to you.You really need to get a life
and find something more productive to do with your life.I suggest trying to find a live girlfriend and a decent job would prevent you from having to do the online version of wanking in public.You may think you are clever and it may make you feel better but everyone else thinks
you are just a sad wanker
Just to put the record straight split infinitives are not considered to be bad grammar
and have been perfectly acceptable for native English speakers to use since the end of the 19th Century.
Comprehensive education I take it.
Like you, I often make silly mistakes when typing but unlike you I would not normally mention such errors when communicating with a decent individual.
ReplyDelete.
I really need to get a life? Have you considered your life? Were you to be writing a blog that was interesting and a stimulating read, offering perhaps some controversial views, you could consider your pastime worthwhile.
.
Instead you publish what is an angry, ill-informed rant. But, I have discovered it is very entertaining, which is why I have not 'made the same mistake' again, of "stumbling onto your cite from Google", I have navigated to it intentionally - for comedy entertainment value.
.
So, explain why you state "You may think you are clever", what makes you say that? I have not said that I'm clever and I don't think I'm that clever, so why make that comment? Could it be that YOU think I'm cleverer than you and that fuels your inferiority complex?
.
And what is it that you think "makes me feel better"? And whatever that is, why does it make me feel better?
.
To state that "everyone else thinks you are just a sad wanker" is fascinating. Is that everyone else that reads your blog? Or everyone else in Crowborough? Expand a little if you would, I'm intrigued.
.
How do you know I don't already have a girlfriend? Or indeed a boyfriend or a wife or both or all three? And how do you know I don't have a decent job and more interestingly, what would you consider to be a decent job? Lorry driver? Blogger? Transportation consultant?
.
Thanks for the lesson on split infinitives; if it wasn't obvious you looked up what a split infinitive was I would have been fooled into thinking you knew the history.
.
So, lots of question there for you to address. I look forward to the answers. But any questions you fail to answer will be just as revealing as those that you do.
.
It's now 2.35am and I have other things to do. You may be interested to know that, just because you apparently think being on the www in the early hours of the morning is either odd or wrong or whatever, it is not. Not everyone lives their life the way you do or keeps the same hours that you do.
.
However, I've enjoyed our little exchange tonight.
.
Taxi!
How many spelling mistakes this time then? Which were intentional (to test you) and which were unintentional?
ReplyDeleteAnonymong
ReplyDeleteWith my help you have improved your spelling and almost got the hang of posting comments .
If you just tried that little bit harder you could actually write something that might have some bearing on the original post.
The clue is in the title so please try to be interesting and relevant.Im sure everyone wants to hear your opinions on the Sussex Police Authority.You still havnt told me which part of my original post you agreed with .
Just ask yourself why the Assistant Chief Constable gave up his job at the Met and moved to
a position with Sussex Police.I know the answer because I took the trouble to find out.
The scruffy bloke used to be a head of a special needs school(not a teacher just a pen pusher)-not exactly a good background for overseeing the Police in Sussex.Funny handshake job I reckon.
I don't feel able to meaningfully debate or comment on the original topic for reasons I will explain and in any case, you are the master of changing the subject and going off at a tangent.
ReplyDelete.
Your method of blogging and manner is what I'm interested in. You criticise others for doing exactly what you do!
.
If only you would calm down and post in a civilised way I can assure you, you WOULD get a significant level of support for your cause. But instead all you do is solicit derision from those you target (and their supporters) and apathy or avoidance from those that might otherwise support your cause.
.
In my case, I have an irrepressible desire to stand up for those targeted (regardless of their guilt) when the allegations are unfair, unfounded or inaccurate.
.
To demonstrate my point, my first comment on this post was not in relation to the subject but a response to a number of your posts I had read. So you saw my worse side as a result of the manner of your posts.
.
Further, when I described you as bigoted - on whichever post it was that I did that - you patronisingly, pedantically and wrongly began a pointless argument about the meaning of that word. Clearly, having read your reply on the ESCC post, where you continue that argument, you are only interested in petty point scoring.
.
It is little wonder therefore that I am tempted to make an allegation that you either don't understand the meaning of the words within the definition of the word bigot, or that you are not reading what I am writing or don't understand it.
.
To demonstrate what I meant in para 3 above and to show goodwill, I will say something about the Sussex Police Authority.
.
I do not think the current system works to benefit taxpayers of this county. Although significant regular surveys are carried out to solicit residents' views and experiences of the police service the results of such surveys depend significantly on the questions asked.
.
Whilst the questions are not wildly inappropriate or purposely asked to seek the 'preferred' answer, they are not probing enough to truly capture the real opinions or wishes of the residents.
.
Furthermore, I could not NAME one Authority member and I suggest that neither could the vast majority of Sussex residents and if you knew the position I hold you would would realise that that is even more amazing.
.
I also feel, with good reason, that the Authority does not understand the minutia or ethic of the workings of the Force and therefore is not well placed to make the relevant or sufficiently stringent demands on the Force.
.
I could tell you much more detail but for the reasons given above I would not do so.
.
I could also give you information about a number of your other posts, including the allegations you made about police use of the helicopter to evacuate an injured moped rider but again for the same reasons I would not.
.
So, that is the price you pay for blogging in the way you do. You lose support and miss the opportunity of gaining much useful information.
.
I will respond later, briefly, to your last comment on the ESCC post.