Attack of the drones over Britain's skies.

Attack of the drones over Britain's skies as Home Office allows police to use military-style unmanned aircraft

Read more


This follows on from the announcement that there will be a National Police Air Service with a fleet of 26 helicopters under the control of the government rather than local forces.Not content with this ramping up of the war against freedom and liberty they are now thinking of having military style
drones patrolling the sky monitoring us all 24 hours a day.

It seems like the state is building up a quasi military force to keep us all in order whilst at the same time running down the military that are the only people with the will and equipment to fight back.

Miltary drones have a raft of sensors which enable them to see what is going on within a building.This is especially handy if tommy taliban is brewing up some explosives in a mud hut in Afghanistan but try as I may I cannot think of a civillian use for this technology.Fleets of helicopters  and cameras monitoring our every move in public combined with unmanned drones peering into our houses and private lives -if this is living in a "free society" then god help us.

Up to this point we all could retire at the end of the day to our little castle and be able to do pretty much what we pleased without state interference.Now nowhere is safe from the prying eyes of the state-the normal state sponsored trolls will no doubt be trotting out the normal "nothing to hide nothing to fear" mantra but most people should be very afraid because we are now all  inmates in prison Britain  and there is no escape.

This has been coming for ages and was trialled during the olympics to see whether there would be riots on the streets over the removal of our last  strands of anything resembling freedom.True to form the great British public did nothing and the PTBs saw this as a green light to go to defcon 1 in the Police state stakes. People like myself who have been trying for years to highlight the constant drip drip erosion of our rights to freedom and liberty were ignored and laughed at as conspiracy nutters.Well now we are where we are who is laughing now -well actually no one is laughing we are all toast .Despite the warnings people have willingly traded all their freedoms for temporary security and now none of us(apart from the ruling elite globalist scum)  have nor deserve neither.

Skip forward a few years and I am sure you will get your door kicked in and dragged off to the gulag if the drones detect that you are using too much energy,or your house hasnt been insulated enough or you are throwing away too much rubbish or you are smoking/drinking /eating the wrong foods  etc etc etc.

Resistance truly is futile unless the majority population wakes up pronto to this developing dystopian nightmare.Still why worry about such minor things as freedom when there is truly X factor corrie enders on the state communication media network and facewitter on the state controlled and monitored  interweb.

Police State?

Are we living in a de facto police state.

The evidence would point to the answer being yes.Even sceptics would find it hard to argue that at the very least the UK is a proto Police state but many people believe we have gone well beyond that stage.
Monitored 24/7 and controlled by petty rules and statutes with our freedom of expression and speech restricted shows all the signs of a fully fledged Police state.We have only ourselves to blame really.

Gun control or people control.

The control freak liberals have done a good job in brainwashing the public into thinking that guns are bad evil things that have no place in civilian hands.
The truth is the powers that be have disarmed the civil population because they are afraid of an organised armed militia rising up to retake our country and re-establish our freedoms that have been eroded to the point of non existence over the last 25 years or so.
We are now in a position whereby the criminals have the guns and the public have no means of defending themselves and their loved ones.The Police ,being an integral part of the state control system ,are not interested in defending the public or defending their rights to freedom.
Being part of the establishment the Police are there to keep the law abiding British public in check and to extract the maximum amount of pounds out of them.
The only organisation that the people have faith in to protect us from an overbearing state is the Army but they are kept occupied fighting futile foreign campaigns far away.
The line in the sand should have been when they banned handguns.Can you imagine the Americans just handing over their guns at a local police station without a fight.People need to realise that a gun is not an offensive weapon it is a defensive weapon of last resort against anyone intent on doing you or your family harm.
No weapon,no freedom,no defence,no chance.

ACPO lie detector trials.

ACPO Ltd are trialling lie detectors for criminal suspects and in particular those suspected of being sex offenders.Who could possibly argue with those scummy perverts and crims having to undertake a lie detector test .
Well lets just consider a few things before making a decision on whether this is a welcome addition to the fight against crime or another stride on the road towards a Police state.

Firstly unaccountable undemocratic ACPO is a private company and has no powers to decide whether lie detectors are introduced or not-only parliament can do that.So the use of lie detectors without parliamentary approval is dodgy to say the least.
Secondly there has been a good reason why lie detectors have not been approved for Police use before.That reason is that they have not been proved to be effective in detecting whether people are telling the truth which is a pretty basic requirement for a lie detector.The technology is old and is no better than it was in the 60s and dependent on the interpretation of the data by a biased operator provided by or paid by ACPO.
Thirdly this means that the right to silence and innocence until proven guilty is consigned to the dustbin marked Police state.Even though you may be completely innocent of any allegations you will be considered guilty if you refuse a lie detector test or if you "fail" the test that is proven to be accurate  only 25% of the time.So the fact that you may be innocent is meaningless because you are considered guilty whether the machine operator says yes or no or indeed whether you say yes or no.The odds dont look good when you consider you will be considered to be guilty of something if you refuse to take the test and if you agree to take the test there is a 75% chance of being told you are a liar and in denial of your crimes.
Taking into account these points it would appear that ACPO is jackbooting its way to putting the cherry on the cake of the proto Police state that we already live in.

I hear people saying well what does it matter they are trialling it on perverts so who cares.Well hang on there these people are totally innocent until proven guilty in a Court of Law.Like all things it will be accused perverts today but you tomorrow facing Russian roulette odds with a lie detector because you did 33mph in a 30 limit or heaven forbid touched a mobile phone whilst sitting in a stationary car.Would you fancy face losing your licence andyour living on the say of an electronic beeper controlled by a fully paid up member of the stasi.
It doesnt take an enormous leap of imagination to see people being pulled off the street by jackbooted policy officers to undertake a lie detector because the local stasi informer has accused you of a thought or hate crime.
Dont fall into the trap of thinking that accused sex offenders deserve anything they get because that is a big mistake.People can easily be accused of a sex crime ( I know someone who was maliciously accused of a sexual assault despite the fact that they didnt even know or had even met the accused) so remember it could be you.

ACPO  have declared war on us all with these proposals and unless they are resisted we will all be screwed by the box that goes beep.

One rule for them...

Eight Police officers charged with corruption have had the case against them dropped because vital evidence has gone missing.

John Terry is likely to face charges for something he alledgedly said to someone else.

Whats the chances of evidence in the John Terry case going missing and the whole thing being dropped.Well if he was a copper the chances would be pretty high but as he is not the chances are zero.

Obviously the Police will do everything to protect the criminals within their ranks but if anyone else oversteps the mark and commits a "speech crime" the book is comprehensively thrown at them.Welcome to Policing in a post democratic proto police state.

Sounds familiar?

The Nazi Police State was to ensure that everybody did as they were told - or paid the price. The Nazi Police were controlled by Heinrich Himmler and his feared secret police - the Gestapo - did as it pleased in Nazi Germany. Children’s loyalty could be developed with a policy of indoctrination via education and the Hitler Youth movement. Time and planning spent in these areas would bring a suitable reward for Hitler.

Adults were a different proposition. Some adults clearly supported Hitler - as the March 1933 election showed. But the same election clearly showed that a substantial number of Germans did not support Hitler and the Nazis. These people were likely to be a constant thorn for Hitler unless they were dealt with. For these people, the Nazis developed a policy of intimidation. Fear became a by-word for those who did not support Hitler. The wrong comment overheard by a Nazi official could have very serious consequences.

Hitler’s police state worked on the rule that if you said nothing, no harm, could come to you. If you had doubts about the way the country was going, you kept them to yourself - or paid the price. As nearly 17 million people had not voted for either the Nazis or the Nationalist in March 1933, a large and visible police force was required to keep this sizeable group under observation and control.

In Nazi Germany the police were allowed to arrest people on suspicion that they were about to do wrong. This gave the police huge powers. All local police units had to draw up a list of people in their locality who might be suspected of being "Enemies of the State". This list was given to the Gestapo - the Secret Police. The Gestapo had the power to do as it liked. Its leader - Reinhard Heydrich - was one of the most feared man in Nazi Germany. His immediate chief was Heinrich Himmler. Both men ran their respective branches with ruthless efficiency.

Those arrested by either the police or the Gestapo had less than three minutes to pack clothing and say their goodbyes. Once arrested, they were sent to the nearest police cell. Those in custody were told to sign Form D-11; this was an "Order For Protective Custody". By signing this, you agreed to go to prison. Those who did not sign it were beaten until they did or officers simply forged their signature. Once a D-11 was signed, you were sent to a concentration camp. How long you stayed here depended on the authorities. The usual rule of thumb was whether it was felt that you had learned your lesson (even if there had not been one to learn) and would behave in an acceptable manner once outside of prison.

With a few tweaks here and there this article could apply in 2010.At least the gestapo dresssed smartly and the trains ran on time which is more that you can say about Britains New Labour Nazi party.

Police State ?